State v. Ward

CourtListener 10150679Scctapp18 juil. 2018

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kevin Maurice Ward, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2017-000819

Appeal From Spartanburg County
Robin B. Stilwell, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-332
Submitted June 1, 2018 – Filed July 18, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of
Columbia, and Kevin Maurice Ward, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.