SCDSS v. Frazier

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Sharonda Frazier, Antonio Sanders, and Diane Frazier,
Defendants,

Of whom Sharonda Frazier is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2017-002112

Appeal From Lexington County
Peter R. Nuessle, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-294
Submitted June 20, 2018 – Filed June 25, 2018

AFFIRMED

Melinda Inman Butler, of The Butler Law Firm, of
Union, for Appellant.

Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Robin Page, of Law Office of Robin Page, LLC, of
Columbia, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Sharonda Frazier appeals a judicial review order placing her
minor child in the custody of Diane Frazier, authorizing the Department of Social
Services (DSS) to terminate further services, and allowing DSS to close its case.
See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-1640 (Supp. 2017). Upon a thorough review of the
record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex
parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve
Frazier's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and WILLIAMS and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.