SCDSS v. Catanzaro

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Michelle R. Catanzaro and Philip A. Catanzaro,
Defendants,

Of whom Philip A. Catanzaro is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2017-001590

Appeal From Colleton County
Peter L. Fuge, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-023
Submitted December 15, 2017 – Filed January 11, 2018

AFFIRMED

Marshall L. Horton and Lindsay Yoas Goodman, both of
Horton & Goodman, LLC, of Bluffton, for Appellant.

Scarlet Bell Moore, of Greenville, for Respondent.
Gregory Michael Galvin, of Galvin Law Group, of
Beaufort, and Jessica Brilhante, of Brilhante Law Office,
LLC, of Aiken, both for the Guardian ad litem.

PER CURIAM: Philip A. Catanzaro appeals the family court's order for
permanency planning. Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's
findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Catanzaro's counsel.

AFFIRMED. 1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.