In the Interest of Miguel E.

CourtListener 10150387Scctapp31 janv. 2018

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest of Miguel E., a Juvenile Under the Age of
Seventeen, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2016-000730

Appeal From Saluda County
Robert E. Newton, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2018-UP-047
Submitted January 1, 2018 – Filed January 31, 2018

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.