SCDSS v. Cheley and Ford

CourtListener 10150322Scctapp27 nov. 2017

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Fredrena Shameka Cheley and Chrondric Maurice Ford,
Defendants,

Of whom Fredrena Shameka Cheley is the Appellant,

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2017-000747

Appeal From Horry County
Timothy H. Pogue, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-446
Submitted October 27, 2017 – Filed November 27, 2017

AFFIRMED

Melanie Carol Nicholson, of Wright, Worley, Pope,
Ekster & Moss, PLLC, of North Myrtle Beach, for
Appellant.

Ernest Joseph Jarrett, of Jenkinson, Jarrett & Kellahan,
PA, of Kingstree, for Respondent.
Ian Andrew Taylor, of the Taylor Law Office, of
Georgetown, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Fredrena Shameka Cheley appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2016). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant
briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Cheley's
counsel.

AFFIRMED. 1

SHORT, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.