CourtListener 10150312•State v. Hoover
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Lexie Edward Hoover, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2016-002277
Appeal From Colleton County
Michael G. Nettles, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-364
Submitted September 1, 2017 – Filed October 4, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Matthew C. Buchanan, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, and Attorney
General Alan McCrory Wilson, both of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HILL, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.