State v. Jones

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Darryl Vincent Jones, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002680

Appeal From Lexington County
Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-291
Submitted May 1, 2017 – Filed July 12, 2017

AFFIRMED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Attorney General Mark Reynolds Farthing, both of
Columbia; and Solicitor Samuel R. Hubbard, III, of
Lexington, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Williams, 303 S.C. 410, 411, 401 S.E.2d 168, 169 (1991)
(holding an issue not raised and ruled upon by the trial court is not preserved for
appeal); Ex parte McMillan, 319 S.C. 331, 334, 461 S.E.2d 43, 45 (1995) (holding
a party cannot acquiesce to an issue at trial but then complain on appeal); State v.
Mitchell, 330 S.C. 189, 195, 498 S.E.2d 642, 645 (1998) ("Because counsel
acquiesced in the [court]'s limitation of his cross-examination, and made no other
objections regarding [the issue], Appellant cannot now complain about this
issue.").

AFFIRMED. 1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.