CourtListener 10150189•Bacchi v. America's Source Consulting
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Anita Bacchi and Kristine Lomas, Respondents,
v.
America's Source Consulting Agency, LLC, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-000670
Appeal From Horry County
Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-309
Submitted June 1, 2017 – Filed July 26, 2017
AFFIRMED
James Ross Snell, Jr. and Vicki D Koutsogiannis, both of
Law Office of James R. Snell, Jr., LLC, of Lexington, for
Appellant.
Francis A. Humphries, Jr., of Monckton, Hembree &
Humphries, PA, of Myrtle Beach, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220, SCACR, and the following
authorities: Wilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330 S.C. 71, 76, 497 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) ("It
is axiomatic that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must
have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial [court] to be preserved for appellate
review."); Regions Bank v. Owens, 402 S.C. 642, 647, 741 S.E.2d 51, 54 (Ct. App.
2013) (holding an argument for setting aside an entry of default was unpreserved
for appellate review because the movant failed to argue the issue to the Master-in-
Equity); Noisette v. Ismail, 304 S.C. 56, 58, 403 S.E.2d 122, 124 (1991) (holding
that when a trial court does not explicitly rule on an argument raised and appellant
makes no Rule 59(e), SCRCP, motion to obtain a ruling, the appellate court may
not address the issue).
AFFIRMED.1
SHORT, WILLIAMS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.