CourtListener 10150104•State v. Franklin
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Wilbert J. Franklin, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2015-002437
Appeal From Sumter County
Maite Murphy, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-218
Submitted April 1, 2017 – Filed May 24, 2017
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia; and Solicitor Ernest Adolphus Finney,
III, of Sumter for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.