State v. Wingate

CourtListener 10149996Scctapp1 févr. 2017

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tamarquis Antwain Wingate, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002717

Appeal From Florence County
Donald B. Hocker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2017-UP-064
Submitted November 1, 2016 – Filed February 1, 2017

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek, of
Columbia; and Tamarquis Antwain Wingate, pro se, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General John Benjamin Aplin,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and MOORE, A.J., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.