State v. Williams

CourtListener 10149424Scctapp30 mars 2016

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

LaQuincy M. Williams, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2014-002769

Appeal From Williamsburg County
W. Jeffrey Young, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-143
Submitted January 1, 2016 – Filed March 30, 2016

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett, of Columbia;
and LaQuincy M. Williams, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.