National Security Fire & Casualty v. Jenrette

CourtListener 10149410Scctapp17 févr. 2016

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

National Security Fire & Casualty Company, Plaintiff,

v.

Rosemary Jenrette, AKA Rosemary Long Jenrette, and
Horry County State Bank, Defendants,

Of whom

Rosemary Jenrette, AKA Rosemary Long Jenrette, is the
Appellant,

and

Horry County State Bank is the Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001285

Appeal From Horry County
George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2016-UP-067
Heard January 14, 2016 – Filed February 17, 2016

AFFIRMED

William W. DesChamps, Jr. and William W.
DesChamps, III, both of DesChamps Law Firm, of
Myrtle Beach, for Appellant.

Randall K. Mullins and Jarrod E. Ownbey, both of
Mullins Law Firm, PA, of North Myrtle Beach, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: In this interpleader action, Rosemary Jenrette appeals the trial
court's order awarding insurance proceeds to Horry County State Bank (the Bank).
Jenrette argues the trial court erred in finding (1) the existence of an equitable lien
in favor of the Bank on the insurance proceeds; (2) she was bound by a covenant in
the mortgage to insure the subject property; and (3) the assignment provision in the
subject mortgage survived the cancellation of the mortgage. We affirm pursuant to
Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Fibkins v. Fibkins, 303 S.C.
112, 115, 399 S.E.2d 158, 160 (Ct. App. 1990) ("An action to establish an
equitable lien is an action in equity."); Townes Assocs., Ltd. v. City of Greenville,
266 S.C. 81, 86, 221 S.E.2d 773, 775 (1976) (holding in an appeal of an action in
equity, tried by the judge alone, the appellate court has jurisdiction to find facts in
accordance with its views of the preponderance of the evidence); Blackwell v. State
Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 237 S.C. 649, 653, 118 S.E.2d 701, 704 (1961) ("It is
well settled that if the mortgagor is bound by covenant in the mortgage or
otherwise to insure the mortgaged premises for the better security of the
mortgagee, the latter will have an equitable lien upon the money due on a policy
taken out by the mortgagor to the extent of the mortgagee's interest in the property
damaged or destroyed."); Jones v. Equicredit Corp. of S.C., 347 S.C. 535, 543-44,
556 S.E.2d 713, 717-18 (Ct. App. 2001) (stating when a foreclosure sale does not
satisfy the mortgage debt, the mortgagee is entitled to collect insurance proceeds if
the unpaid amount of the mortgage is in excess of the insurance proceeds).

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.