Harris v. McKinney

CourtListener 10148964Scctapp2 avr. 2015

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Brian & Candi Harris, Respondents,

v.

Lauren McKinney, Tyrone Jerry, Catawba Indian Nation,
and South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Defendants,

Of whom Tyrone Jerry is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor child under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2014-001721

Appeal From Aiken County
Gordon B. Jenkinson, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-180
Submitted March 23, 2015 – Filed April 2, 2015

AFFIRMED

Christopher Charles Johnson, of Nimmons & Malchow,
P.C., of Augusta, GA, for Appellant.

Brian Austin Katonak, of the Law Office of Brian
Katonak, PA, of Aiken, Respondents.
PER CURIAM: Tyrone Jerry appeals the family court's final order terminating
his parental rights to his minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2014). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
facts and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.