CourtListener 10148928•Ex Parte: Tara Dawn Shurling
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Ex Parte: Tara Dawn Shurling, Attorney, Appellant,
In Re:
State of South Carolina, Respondent,
v.
Bejay Harley, Defendant.
Appellate Case No. 2013-001298
Appeal From Richland County
L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-215
Submitted March 26, 2015 – Filed April 29, 2015
AFFIRMED
Tara Dawn Shurling, of Law Office of Tara Dawn
Shurling, PA, of Columbia, for Appellant.
James Hugh Ryan III, of South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Tara Dawn Shurling appeals the circuit court's order denying her
additional attorney's fees in excess of $10,000 and limiting her reimbursement for
general expenses to $750. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the
following authorities: Ex Parte Shurling, 408 S.C. 309, 312 n.6, 759 S.E.2d 714,
715 n.6 (2014) (declining to reach appellant's statutory construction argument
regarding the Indigent Defense Act because the clear language of the circuit court's
funding order was controlling in the case); Ex Parte Brown, 393 S.C. 214, 220, 711
S.E.2d 899, 902 (2011) (stating an award of attorney's fees in excess of the
statutory cap set forth in section 17-3-50 of the South Carolina Code (2014) is
within the sound discretion of the circuit court); Charleston Cnty. Dep't of Soc.
Servs. v. Father, 317 S.C. 283, 288, 454 S.E.2d 307, 310 (1995) ("There is a long-
standing rule in this State that one judge of the same court cannot overrule
another."); Bailey v. State, 309 S.C. 455, 464, 424 S.E.2d 503, 508 (1992) ("[A]
determination of an attorney's costs and expenses for trial preparation shall also be
made within the discretion of the trial judge.").
AFFIRMED.1
THOMAS, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.