Harris v. SCDC

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Stefen Harris, Appellant,

v.

South Carolina Department of Corrections, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2014-000048

Appeal From The Administrative Law Court
John D. McLeod, Administrative Law Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-063
Submitted December 1, 2014 – Filed February 2, 2015

AFFIRMED

Stefen Harris, pro se.

Shanika K. Johnson, of the South Carolina Department of
Corrections, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: S.C. Code Ann. § 1-23-610(B)(d) (Supp. 2014) (providing this court
may reverse or modify a decision of the administrative law court if the substantive
rights of the appellant have been prejudiced because the decision is affected by an
error of law); S.C. Code Ann. § 44-53-375(C)(1)(c) (Supp. 1994) (providing a
person convicted of a third offense of trafficking in ten or more grams but less than
twenty-eight grams of methamphetamine or cocaine base must serve "a mandatory
minimum term of imprisonment of not less than twenty-five years nor more than
thirty years, no part of which may be suspended nor probation granted").

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.