Ward v. Ashbaugh

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Derick Ward, Appellant,

v.

Margaret H. Ashbaugh, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001622

Appeal From Florence County
R. Knox McMahon, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-077
Submitted January 1, 2015 – Filed February 18, 2015

AFFIRMED

Adam Protheroe and David Elliott Tait, both of South
Carolina Legal Services, of Florence, for Appellant.

Karl A. Folkens and Louis David Nettles, both of
Folkens Law Firm, P.A., of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Derick Ward appeals the circuit court's order affirming the
magistrates court's issuance of a writ of ejectment, arguing the circuit court erred
by: (1) finding the magistrates court had subject matter jurisdiction, (2) denying
him substantive due process, and (3) denying him procedural due process. We
affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:

1. As to Issue 1: S.C. Code Ann. § 22-3-10(11) (2007) ("Magistrates have
concurrent civil jurisdiction in the following cases: . . . (11) in any action to
recover the possession of personal property claimed, the value of which, as stated
in the affidavit of the plaintiff, his agent, or attorney, does not exceed the sum of
seven thousand five hundred dollars . . . ."); Brockbank v. Best Capital Corp., 341
S.C. 372, 379, 534 S.E.2d 688, 692 (2000) ("A mobile home usually is classified
as personal property.").

2. As to Issues 2 and 3: Herron v. Century BMW, 395 S.C. 461, 465, 719 S.E.2d
640, 642 (2011) ("At a minimum, issue preservation requires that an issue be raised
to and ruled upon by the [circuit court]."); id. ("Constitutional arguments are no
exception to the preservation rules, and if not raised to the [circuit] court, the issues
are deemed waived on appeal."); I'On, L.L.C. v. Town of Mt. Pleasant, 338 S.C.
406, 422, 526 S.E.2d 716, 724 (2000) ("If the losing party has raised an issue in the
lower court, but the court fails to rule upon it, the party must file a motion to alter
or amend the judgment in order to preserve the issue for appellate review.").

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, GEATHERS, and McDONALD, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.