Parsons v. Parsons

CourtListener 10148765Scctapp28 janv. 2015

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Johnny Andrew Parsons, Appellant,

v.

Tabatha Jacobs Parsons, Respondent.

Appellate Case No. 2012-212706

Appeal From Williamsburg County
Angela R. Taylor, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-047
Submitted December 1, 2014 – Filed January 28, 2015

AFFIRMED

Gregory B. Askins, of Askins Chandler & Askins, of
Hemingway, and Brooks Roberts Fudenberg, of Law
Office of Brooks R. Fudenberg, of Mount Pleasant, for
Appellant.

Tabatha Jacobs Parsons, of Georgetown, pro se.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: Crossland v. Crossland, 408 S.C. 443, 452, 759 S.E.2d 419, 423
(2014) ("An award of alimony rests within the sound discretion of the family court
and will not be disturbed absent an abuse of discretion."); S.C. Code Ann. § 20-3-
130(C) (2014) (listing the factors a court must consider in determining an award of
alimony); Bodkin v. Bodkin, 388 S.C. 203, 215-16, 694 S.E.2d 230, 237 (Ct. App.
2010) (providing no single factor is dispositive in making an alimony award).

AFFIRMED.1

HUFF, SHORT, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.