Coastal Federal v. Griffin

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

Coastal Federal Credit Union, Respondent,

v.

Clarence LeAnders Griffin, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-211872

Appeal From Richland County
L. Casey Manning, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-469
Submitted October 1, 2014 – Filed December 17, 2014

AFFIRMED

Clarence LeAnders Griffin, Jr., of Columbia, pro se.

David P. Nanney, Jr., Charles Nathaniel Griffin, III, and
Sarah Dalonzo-Baker, all of Kirschbaum Nanney Keenan
& Griffin, PA, of Raleigh, NC, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. M & T Enters. of Mt. Pleasant, 379 S.C. 645,
658, 667 S.E.2d 7, 14 (Ct. App. 2008) ("It is well settled that an issue must have
been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate
review."); Bean v. S.C. Cent. R.R. Co., 392 S.C. 532, 560, 709 S.E.2d 99, 113-14
(Ct. App. 2011) (finding an issue unpreserved for appellate review when the trial
court failed to address the issue in its order granting summary judgment and the
appellant did not file a motion under Rule 59(e), SCRCP).

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.