SCDSS v. Amber S.

CourtListener 10148320Scctapp20 févr. 2014

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Amber S. and Michael B., Defendants,

Of whom Amber S. is the Appellant,

In the interest of minor children under the age of
eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2013-001573

Appeal From Greenville County
Alex Kinlaw, Jr., Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-075
Submitted February 3, 2014 – Filed February 20, 2014

AFFIRMED

Lauren Marie Taylor, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Rosemerry Felder-Commander, of the South Carolina
Department of Social Services, of Greenville, for
Respondent.
Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Amber S. appeals the family court's final order terminating her
parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2012 &
Supp. 2013). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings
of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and SHORT and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.