State v. Falls

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jeffrey Bernard Falls, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-198091

Appeal From Spartanburg County
Roger L. Couch, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-420
Submitted October 1, 2013 – Filed November 20, 2013

AFFIRMED

James P. Craig, of Craig Law Firm, P.C., of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Assistant
Deputy Attorney General David A. Spencer, both of
Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Griffin, 339 S.C. 74, 77, 528 S.E.2d 668, 669 (2000) (stating a
ruling in limine is not final and unless an objection is made at the time the
evidence is offered and a final ruling procured, the issue is not preserved for
review); State v. King, 349 S.C. 142, 148-50, 561 S.E.2d 640, 643-44 (Ct. App.
2002) (holding the trial court's ruling to deny defendant's motion in limine to
suppress drug evidence on the grounds that the search was within the confines of
the Fourth Amendment was not preserved for review when defense counsel failed
to renew his objection at trial when the drugs were actually entered into evidence).

AFFIRMED.1

SHORT, WILLIAMS, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.