SCDSS v. Michelle G.

CourtListener 10148189Scctapp21 nov. 2013

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Michelle G., Kenneth G., and Robert L., Defendants,

Of whom Michelle G. is the Appellant.

In the interest of three minor children under the age of 18
years.

Appellate Case No. 2013-000880

Appeal From Anderson County
Timothy H. Pogue, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-440
Submitted November 13, 2013 – Filed November 21, 2013

AFFIRMED

Carla Jane Patat, of Patat Law Firm, LLC, of Greer, for
Appellant.

Kathleen J. Hodges, of the South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Brittany Dreher Tye, of Senerius & Tye, Attorneys at
Law, of Anderson, for Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Michelle G. appeals from the family court's removal order. See
S.C. Code 63-7-1660(E) (2010). Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that
warrant briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and PIEPER and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.