State v. Alford

CourtListener 10148120Scctapp11 sept. 2013

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Timothy Wayne Alford, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2012-211997

Appeal From York County
Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-353
Submitted August 1, 2013 – Filed September 11, 2013

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Dayne C. Phillips, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Assistant Attorney General James Rutledge Johnson, of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, GEATHERS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.