CourtListener 10147974•State v. McDaniel
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Issac McDaniel, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2011-202067
Appeal From Lexington County
George C. James, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2013-UP-284
Submitted May 1, 2013 – Filed June 26, 2013
APPEAL DISMISSED
Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Tommy Evans, Jr., of the South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT, THOMAS, and PIEPER, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.