State v. Lavar A. Smith

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Lavar Anthony Smith, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2021-000431

Appeal From Marion County
Robert J. Bonds, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-218
Submitted May 1, 2023 – Filed June 7, 2023

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender David Alexander, of Columbia, and
Lavar A. Smith, pro se, both for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Melody Jane Brown,
both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED. 1

THOMAS, MCDONALD, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.