State v. Douglas

CourtListener 10147501Scctapp24 oct. 2012

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eric Eugene Douglas, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2011-193448

Appeal From Spartanburg County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-567
Submitted October 1, 2012 – Filed October 24, 2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, of the South Carolina Department
of Probation, Parole & Pardon Services, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Dismissed after review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, THOMAS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.