State v. Sheriff

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.
David Dale Sheriff, Appellant.

__________

Appeal From Anderson County
R. Lawton McIntosh, Circuit Court Judge

__________

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-453
Submitted May 1, 2012 – Filed July 18, 2012
__________

APPEAL DISMISSED
__________

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of
Columbia, and David Dale Sheriff, pro se, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Christina T. Adams, of
Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: David Dale Sheriff appeals his conviction of first-
degree burglary, arguing the trial court erred in not allowing the State's notice
of intent to seek a sentence of life without parole into evidence. Additionally,
Sheriff filed a pro se brief. After a thorough review of the record and all
briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., and HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.