CourtListener 10147342•State v. Jones
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Lamar Jones, Appellant.
Appellate Case No. 2010-178246
Appeal From Charleston County
Roger M. Young, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-455
Submitted July 2, 2012 – Filed July 25, 2012
AFFIRMED
Appellate Defender Susan Barber Hackett and Appellate
Defender Tristan M. Shaffer, both of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Senior Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, and Assistant
Attorney General Christina J. Catoe, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Scarlett A. Wilson, of Charleston, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Lamar Jones appeals his convictions of second-degree burglary
and possession of tools of crime, arguing the plea court erred in denying his motion
to withdraw his guilty plea because the plea was not made knowingly and
voluntarily. We affirm1 pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following
authorities: State v. Geer, 391 S.C. 179, 193, 705 S.E.2d 441, 448 (Ct. App. 2010)
("It is well settled that an issue may not be raised for the first time in a post-trial
motion."); State v. McKinney, 278 S.C. 107, 108, 292 S.E.2d 598, 599 (1982)
("Absent timely objection at a plea proceeding, the unknowing and involuntary
nature of a guilty plea can only be attacked through the more appropriate channel
of Post-Conviction Relief.").
AFFIRMED.
FEW, C.J., HUFF and SHORT, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.