State v. Henson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Duane Henson, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Gordon G. Cooper, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2007-UP-405

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
4, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, South Carolina Commission on
Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Teresa A Knox, S.C. Dept. of Probation Parole & Pardon, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Duane Henson, was convicted of possession
of crack cocaine and sentenced to five years imprisonment, suspended upon
service of five years of probation.  Following a probation revocation hearing,
the court revoked two years of Henson’s suspended sentence and terminated his
probation.  Henson’s counsel
attached to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she
had reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Henson did not file a separate pro se brief.  After a
thorough review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., HUFF, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.