CourtListener 10143074•DSS v. Tiffany R. S.
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
Department of
Social Services, Respondent,
v.
Tiffany R. S.,
Shun L. W., Aaron W., Charles F., Elisha W., John D., Richard R., Steven D.,
and the minor children under the age of eighteen (18) years: Y.J.S. (D.O.B.
10/07/96), T.Q.D.S. (D.O.B. 12/17/98), and Y.J. F. (D.O.B. 06/14/00), of whom
Tiffany R. S. is Appellant.
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Kellum W. Allen, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-413
Submitted October 1, 2007 Filed October
5, 2007
AFFIRMED
Sean Giovannetti, of Spartanburg, for Appellant.
Julie Rau and Tarita A. Dunbar, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
Michael Todd Thigpen, of Spartanburg, for Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Tiffany R. S.
appeals a family court order terminating her parental rights to her three minor
children. The court found her parental rights should be terminated on three
grounds: 1) she failed to remedy the conditions that caused the removal of the
children; 2) she had a diagnosable mental condition and it was unlikely the condition
would change within a reasonable time; and 3) the children had been in foster
care for at least fifteen of the last twenty-two months. Additionally, the
court found termination was in the best interest of the children. After a thorough review of the record pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C.
465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we affirm the
family courts ruling and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
AFFIRMED.[1]
HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, J.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.