State v. Krupinski

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Irvin
C. Krupinski,Appellant.

Appeal From Lee County

 Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2007-UP-446

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
9, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellant Defender Aileen P. Clare, South Carolina
Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia; Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of
Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Irvin C. Krupinski appeals his conviction
for second-degree burglary resulting in a sentence of ten years confinement. 
He contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict. 
After a thorough review of the record and
counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Krupinski’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.