State v. Wilson

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jeremy Wilson, Appellant.

Appeal from Orangeburg County

James C. Williams, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-469

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October
11, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor David M. Pascoe, Jr., of Summerville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: 
Jeremy Wilson was convicted of distribution of crack-cocaine and distribution
of crack-cocaine within proximity of a playground.  He received two concurrent
ten year sentences.  On appeal, Wilson argues the trial judge erred in
replacing a juror for alleged misconduct.  Wilson’s counsel attached a petition
to be relieved, stating she reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks
merit.  Wilson also submitted a pro se response brief reiterating
counsel’s argument and additionally asserting the trial judge erred “by not
dismissing State’s witness due to lack of credibility.”  Pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), after a thorough review of the record, counsel’s
brief, and Wilson’s pro se brief, we dismiss the appeal and grant
counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN,
C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.