State v. Hemphill

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jamar Rakee Hemphill Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 G. Thomas Cooper, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-480

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October 12, 2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief
Attorney Joseph L. Savitz III, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Thomas E. Pope, of
York,  for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Jamar Rakee Hemphill appeals his guilty plea for
trafficking crack cocaine, possession of crack cocaine, possession of crack
cocaine with the intent to distribute within proximity of a park, possession of
a stolen vehicle, resisting arrest, and malicious injury to personal property,
as well as his negotiated sentence of thirteen years.  Hemphill argues his
guilty plea was conditional, and thus, invalid.  After a thorough review of the
record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss[1] Hemphill’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.