State v. Perella

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In the Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

David Perella, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

Howard P. King,
Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-504

Submitted October 1, 2007 – Filed October 30, 2007   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief
Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  David Perella
appeals his guilty pleas for:  (1) trafficking in methamphetamines 28-100
grams, second offense; (2) manufacturing methamphetamines, third offense; (3)
possession of crack cocaine, third offense; (4) trafficking in methamphetamines
28-100 grams, second offense; (5) possession of a weapon during the commission
of a violent crime; (6) possession of a stolen pistol; (7) possession of
Klonopin, third offense; (8) possession of Percocet, third offense; (9)
possession of Xanax, third offense; (10) possession of Hydrocodone and
Acetaminophen; and (11) possession of marijuana, third offense.  Perella
asserts his guilty plea was invalid because the trial judge informed him of his
right to an appeal, rendering the plea conditional.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Perella’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.