CourtListener 10142978•State v. Watson
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In the Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Michael Watson, Appellant.
Appeal From Marlboro County
Paul M. Burch,
Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-505
Submitted October 1, 2007 Filed October 30, 2007
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief
Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Jay E. Hodge, Jr., of Cheraw, for Respondent.
PER
CURIAM: Michael Watson
appeals his convictions for two counts of assault and battery with intent to
kill and one count of discharging a weapon into a dwelling. After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Watsons appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HEARN, C.J.,
HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.