In the Interest of Barry Mc.

CourtListener 10142910Scctapp6 juin 2007

Texte intégral

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest of Barry Mc., A Juvenile under the age of seventeen (17), Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

 Jeffrey Young, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-277

Submitted June 1, 2007 – Filed June 6,
2007

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargn McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Warren Blair Giese, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Barry Mc. pleaded guilty to assault of a high and
aggravated nature.  Barry argues on appeal that the court erred in accepting
his guilty plea because he consistently maintained the assault was not
intentional.  After a thorough review of
the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] Barry’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., KITTREDGE,
J., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.