State v. Wiles

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR
RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2),
SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Shawn Wiles, Appellant.

Appeal From Saluda County

William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2007-UP-318

Submitted June 1, 2007 – Filed June 14,
2007

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant. 

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, Senior Assistant Attorney General Norman Mark
Rapoport, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for
Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Shawn Wiles was
convicted of assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature and failure to
stop for a blue light.  Wiles appeals his convictions, arguing the court erred
in admitting evidence of his prior prison escape.

We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b)(2), SCACR, and the following
authority:  State v. Forrester, 343 S.C. 637, 642, 541 S.E.2d 837, 840 (2001) (finding a motion in limine to
exclude evidence made at the beginning of trial generally does not preserve the
issue for appellate review).[1]

AFFIRMED.

STILWELL,
SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.