State v. Roberson

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS

PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Clinton Roberson, Appellant.

Appeal From Dorchester County

 Diane Schafer Goodstein, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-547

Submitted October 3, 2005 – Filed October 12, 2005   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Deputy Chief Attorney Wanda P. Hagler, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Clinton Roberson appeals his conviction for failure to register as a sex offender.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Roberson’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, HUFF, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.