State v. Miller

CourtListener 10138467Scctapp17 août 2005

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(D)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The
State,        Respondent,

v.

JoAnne S.
Miller,        Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

Henry F. Floyd, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.
2005-UP-491

Submitted August 1, 2005 – Filed August 17, 2005  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender
Eleanor Duffy Cleary, Office of Appellate Defense, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, Office of the Attorney General, of Columbia,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Joanne S.
Miller appeals her convictions for assault and battery of a high and aggravated
nature and criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature. 
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Miller’s counsel
attached a petition to be relieved as counsel to the final brief, stating she
reviewed the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Miller did not
file a separate pro se brief. After a thorough review of the
record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss Miller’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

ANDERSON, HUFF, and WILLIAMS, JJ.,
concur.   

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215,
SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.