State v. Kirby

CourtListener 10138095Scctapp10 févr. 2005

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Lonnie C. Kirby,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2005-UP-106

Submitted February 1, 2005 – Filed February
10, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant, Lonnie C. Kirby,
pled guilty to second-degree burglary and grand larceny.  The trial judge sentenced
Kirby to concurrent terms of fifteen years on the burglary charge and ten years
on the larceny charge.  Kirby’s counsel attached to the brief a petition to
be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed the record and concluded
this appeal lacks merit.  Kirby did not file a separate pro se
brief.  We dismiss pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991).  Counsel’s
petition to be relieved is granted.1

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

GOOLSBY, HUFF, and STILWELL, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.