State v. Harvey

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS

PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED
BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Bobby Harvey, Appellant.

Appeal From Anderson County

J. C. Buddy Nicholson, Jr., Circuit
Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2005-UP-029

Submitted January 1, 2005 – Filed January
13, 2005

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Attorney Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for Appellant. 

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Druanne Dykes White, of Anderson,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Bobby Harvey appeals his convictions for distribution of
crank and distribution of crank within one-half mile of a school.  Counsel for
Harvey attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel.  Harvey
filed a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d
357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable
on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Harvey’s appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.