CourtListener 10137976•State v. Steed
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Robert Antonio Steed, Appellant.
Appeal From Charleston County
Luke N. Brown, Jr., Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-608
Submitted December 1, 2004 Filed December 6, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Stephan Victor Futeral, of Mt. Pleasant, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Robert Antonio Steed was found guilty of
criminal conspiracy; first-degree burglary; armed robbery; assault and battery
with intent to kill (ABIK); and murder. He was sentenced to five years for
conspiracy; thirty years for first-degree burglary; thirty years for armed robbery;
twenty years for ABIK; and thirty years for murder.
Steeds appellate counsel filed a brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel additionally
submitted a petition to be relieved from representation, asserting there are
no directly appealable issues of arguable merit. Steed filed a pro se
response with the Court.
After a review of the record pursuant to
Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991),
we dismiss the appeal and grant counsels petition to be relieved.
[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ANDERSON, STILWELL and SHORT, JJ., concur.
[1] We
decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.