State v. Goodyear

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS

PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED
BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Maxie Lee Goodyear, Appellant.

Appeal From Marion County

 James E. Brogdon, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-625

Submitted December 1, 2004 –Filed December
10, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W.
McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia;
and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Maxie Lee Goodyear appeals his guilty pleas to assault
and battery with intent to kill and assault with intent to kill.  Counsel for
Goodyear attached to the final brief a petition to be relieved as counsel. 
Goodyear filed a separate pro se response. 

After a review of the record as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d
357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues that are arguable
on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss Goodyear’s appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ANDERSON, STILWELL, and SHORT, JJ., concur.