State v. Grant

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD 

NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY 

PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Savannah C. Grant,       
Appellant,

Appeal From Greenville County

John C. Few, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-517

Submitted October 1, 2004 – Filed October
14, 2004  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail,
of Greenville;,for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Savannah Grant appeals her
conviction for assault and battery with intent to kill.  Grant argues the trial
court erred in denying her motion for a directed verdict.  Grant’s counsel attached
to the brief a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that she had reviewed
the record and concluded this appeal lacks merit.  Grant filed a separate pro
se brief and supplemental briefs alleging various errors on the part
of the trial court, the police department, and her defense attorney.  After
a thorough review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Grant’s pro se
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss [1] Grant’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to
be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.