State v. Greene

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT

BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2),
SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Terry Lynn Greene,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Richland County

Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-515

Submitted October 1, 2004 – Filed October
14, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal Counsel
Tommy Evans, J. and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Terry Lynn Greene appeals the
revocation of his probation.  Greene’s appellate counsel has petitioned to be
relieved as counsel, stating she has reviewed the record and has concluded Greene’s
appeal is without merit.  The sole issue briefed by counsel concerns whether
the circuit court erred in finding Greene willfully violated the terms of his
probation.  Greene did not file a separate pro se reply brief.

After a review of the record as required by Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable issues
that are arguable on their merits.  Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal and
grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., HUFF and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

         
1  We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules
215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.