State v. Green

CourtListener 10137817Scctapp15 sept. 2004

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

John Jabar Green, Appellant.

Appeal From Georgetown County

 Paula H. Thomas, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2004-UP-464

Submitted September 14, 2004 – Filed September 15, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,  Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh,  Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Mr. Green appeals after pleading guilty
to assault with the intent to kill (AWIK), and two counts of pointing and/or
presenting a firearm.  The trial court sentenced him to eight years on the AWIK
charge and five years suspended on time served and three years probation on
the presenting charges.  On appeal, Green argues his guilty plea failed to comply
with the requirements set forth in Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 (1969). 
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Green’s counsel
attached a petition to be relieved stating that he has reviewed the record and
found the appeal to be without merit.  Green did not file a separate pro
se brief.

After a thorough review of the record pursuant
to Anders and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved. 

APPEAL DISMISSED.
[1]

GOOLSBY, ANDERSON, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.