State v. Flynn

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD

NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY

PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Richard Burr Flynn, Appellant.

Appeal From Spartanburg County

 Larry R. Patterson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-449

Submitted July 7, 2004 – Filed August
25, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Assistant Appellate Defender Wanda H. Haile, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Deputy Director for Legal Services Teresa A. Knox, Legal
Counsel Tommy Evans, Jr. and Legal Counsel J. Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia,for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Richard Burr Flynn appeals
the revocation of his probation, arguing the trial court abused its discretion
by basing its decision partially on Flynn’s failure to pay supervision fees. 
Flynn’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that
she reviewed the record and concluded the appeal lacks merit.  Flynn did not
file a separate pro se brief.  After a thorough review of the
record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
[1] Flynn’s appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J., HUFF, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decided this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.