CourtListener 10137728•State v. Orange
Texte intégral
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT
BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Edward Orange, Appellant.
Appeal From Williamsburg County
Clifton Newman, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-374
Submitted April 21, 2004 Filed June 17, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Chief Appellate Defender Daniel T. Stacey, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney General
John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor C. Kelly Jackson, of Sumter; for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Edward Orange pled guilty to armed robbery and
possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent crime, and the circuit
court sentenced him to fourteen years imprisonment for armed robbery and five
years imprisonment for possession of a firearm during the commission of a violent
crime, the sentences to run concurrently. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Oranges counsel attached a petition to be relieved. Orange
did not file a pro se response.
After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Oranges appeal and grant counsels petition
to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ., concurring.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving any issue
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.