State v. Seawright

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE
239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Wallace Seawright, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

 William P. Keesley, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-307

Submitted February 20, 2004 – Filed
May 6, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia,
for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Charles H. Richardson,
all of Columbia, and Solicitor Barbara R. Morgan, of Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Wallace
Seawright was convicted of possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute
and possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute within the proximity
of a school.  {R. 104-105}  He was sentenced to eighteen years imprisonment
for possession of crack cocaine with intent to distribute and ten years imprisonment
for possession with intent to distribute within the proximity of a school, the
sentences to run concurrently.  {R. 111-112}  Pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Seawright’s counsel attached a petition
to be relieved as counsel.  Seawright did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Seawright’s appeal and grant counsel’s
petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concurring.

[1] Because oral argument would not aid the Court in resolving
any issue on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215 and 220(b)(2), SCACR.