CourtListener 10137610•State v. Southerland
Texte intégral
PER CURIAM: Robert McKoy waived presentment on an indictment for possession
of a stolen vehicle, pled guilty, and was sentenc
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT
AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH
CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Desmond Jay Southerland,
Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville
County
Charles B. Simmons, Jr., Special
Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion
No. 2004-UP-353
Submitted March 19, 2004
Filed May 27, 2004
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Assistant Appellant
Defender Wanda P. Hagler,
Office of Appellate Defense,
of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan
McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John
W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy
Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Robert M. Ariail,
of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Desmond Jay Southerland
was indicted of and subsequently pled guilty to possession of marijuana with
intent to distribute. Southerlands appellate counsel submitted a petition
to be relieved as counsel, stating she has reviewed the record and has concluded
Southerlands appeal is without merit. Southerland did not file a pro se
brief with the court.
After a review of the record as required
by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we hold there are no directly appealable
issues that are arguable on their merits. Accordingly, we dismiss Southerlands
appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved. [1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and BEATTY, JJ.,
concur.
[1] Because oral argument would not aid the court in resolving the issues
on appeal, we decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rules 215
and 220(b)(2), SCACR.
Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude
Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.