State v. Norton

CourtListener 10137573Scctapp20 avr. 2004

Texte intégral

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT

BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT
IN ANY PROCEEDING

EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2),
SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State,       
Respondent,

v.

Deryl Norton,       
Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County

Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2004-UP-272

Submitted February 23, 2004 – Filed
April 20, 2004

APPEAL DISMISSED

Assistant Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, Office of
Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Appellant pled guilty to  four
counts of armed robbery and two weapons charges.  He was sentenced to                                                           
seventeen years in prison.  Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S.
738 (1967), appellant’s counsel attached a petition to be relieved.  Appellant
did not file a pro se response.

After review of the record pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams,  305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d
357 (1991), we dismiss this appeal and grant counsel’s petition to be relieved.
[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

GOOLSBY, HOWARD, and KITTREDGE, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant
to Rule 215, SCACR.

Poursuivez vos recherches dans ChatGPT ou Claude

Connectez Omnilex pour rechercher dans le corpus juridique depuis votre assistant IA.